The article was very different. I don't think i would want to give up a baby that i just carried for 9 months no matter how much money you would be offering me. I wouldn't want to be global baby either knowing that my mom just gave me up because the money was the right amount. Now I don't think its fair that you have given up your baby to a couple and then later you decide you want the baby back i do not think that is the right then to do.
The paragraph I read, I think that is not the new things I never hear about it. God create of us and gave us ability to have baby that man and wife after marry each other. And the paragraph talk about the man transform the sprem and to the other country hospital for another women to have baby, just benifit the people who cann't have baby and the gay couple want to adopt baby.But I don't think that is the bible told us to do, if for a example god don't want you to have baby must have plant for that , also god dosen't allowing homosexual that is why only man and women after marry can have baby. It is not the right way and that is doing the oppiside that bible told us to do.
after reading the paragraph it still showed what i believe of no matter what you shouldnt give your kid up for money or try the surrogate process if you are homosexual because it is wrong one for being homosexual and two just transplanting your sperm into a woman just so she could have kid she cant even keep isnt right
This article is about how a business that helps couples get babies through a surrogate and a sperm donor is very touchy. In some ways I agree with it like if a straight couple who were not able to have a baby used this program and had a baby that way is fine with me. But when a gay couple tries to use the program and it is illegal in other places for them to do so I think it would be wrong. I have no problem with gays being gays but lets say they get a kid and the kid is taught that being gay is the only path for them and the couple takes away that kids free will to do what they want. I think that is wrong and should be addressed for how they should raise the kid.
I don't think this is that great of a plan for having a baby I think people should do the traditional adopt a baby idea and it is more than wrong to basically sell yourself and in that manner sell your kid also because no matter how much money you make you have to love with the fact that you just gave up your kid
The article is about couples getting help from surrogates to have a child.It is emotional for most couples if they can't have a baby and the only chance they have to having a child it's through this process or adoption.There is no problem with going through this process but there is a lot of work,patience,determination that comes with it.I also see that there is no problem with gay couples trying to have a baby because they will do,treat and educate their child the same way a normal couple would.They should be given the chance to experience and have a family.This is also a really hard job for most surrogates because most of them get attach to the child and still has the child taken away from them because they agreed with the law to give the child up once it's born.I think this is a miracle for most couples who can't have babies;this is their second chance of having a family.
I enjoyed this article, however, I don't think its right to bring life into the world and then just give up. I understand that a lot of people aren't ready for responsibilities so they rather put it off on someone else. To sell yourself is one thing, but to sell a child is extreme. No amount of money is worth you giving up your child and its sad that people actually consider that option.
I found this to be a bit extraordinary. Most people wouldn't think twice about rejected such a plan. However, is it really wrong for this to happen? One woman couldn't have a baby for medical reasons. The man donated his sperm so that it could be introduced to the egg artificially. The man didn't commit adultery by doing so and neither did either woman. All that occurred was legal and shows a group of people from around the globe working together toward a common task.
this article is about a tough subject for some to understand, surrogates. I feel like it's a blessing to families who are not able to conceive children to have a surrogate to carry your child. some might not understand the process and some consider it adultery because the mans sperm is going in the woman but it's nowhere near that. I also think that you need to pick the right person to carry your child for you. has to be Christian, responsible, healthy, mature, etc. a person just like you who's willing to carry the baby.
The subject of surrogates if a controversial subject for many people. For me, I believe it should be available for women. If they want to have a child with their DNA in it they should be able to. If someone else wants to give some others a chance to start a family then they should be able to make that choice without people judging them for it. If they want to adopt or use surrogates, either is fine in my eyes.
This a weird article. Personally I think there's nothing wrong with having a surrogate to carry your child. A lot of people don't really know the process of this and that's why the disagree with this procedure. But I still think that adopting a baby would be a better idea. It really depends on the persons preference but either way is cool I guess, it doesn't affect me.
This article was kind of weird and is a touchy subject . I can understand why people would want to do this . If they can't have a baby , I see why they would want to do this but I & a lot of people would not agree with it . How can you hold a baby inside of you for nine months and then just give it away ? How would the baby feel , growing up and possibly finding out about all of it ? I don't agree with it but it's up to the people who are put in the situation . I think it would be better to just adopt like how most people have done it but it's up to them .
Honestly, I understand that she was trying to do something nice for her children and a but you can't just breed another baby to give away for money no matter how much, that is no excuse, because if baby finds out that that was the case it was born it will grow up hating forever and feel like a mistake or used.
This article i read was vey interesting. If somebody would want me to have their child i think i would have to much of an emotional attachment to the child cause of the person i am. But i agree that her other children must come first and they are important and so are their futures. I think the parents should of though about adopting a child then putting another human being thru this.
This article was a tough topic. I feel that it is mostly wrong to do something like that because you're kind of selling yourself and your baby. It can benefit some people that can't necessarily afford to adopt or have someone carry a baby for them so this can go both ways honestly. I just wouldn't want to live with the fact that im selling my kid if that was me
This article was a tough topic. I feel that it is mostly wrong to do something like that because you're kind of selling yourself and your baby. It can benefit some people that can't necessarily afford to adopt or have someone carry a baby for them so this can go both ways honestly. I just wouldn't want to live with the fact that im selling my kid if that was me
This is a really hard subject to talk about. I am almost at a loss for words and that is not because I have never heard of this before but simply because I don't know how I feel about this. I completely understand wanting to have a baby even when you're not able to. I believe every stable woman who wants to have a child should be given the opportunity to do so but I don't know how I feel about this particular process. I am undecided for several reasons. I also assume it must be hard for the surrogate mothers to let go of the children because whether they want to admit it or not, there must be some type of emotional attachment. I would have to read more articles and look into this a little deeper to develop a stronger and clearer opinion.
After reading this paragraph, I think I would not give up a baby that I had to carry in my womb for 9 months. I would not do it for any kind of money, if the parents can not have a baby, I would tell them to adopt, but that's just me. I also think after having a baby in your womb for 9 months, it would be very hard to give that baby to some other people, you would have plenty of feelings toward that baby, that the other person does not.
This is a tough subject to talk about. I really dont have an opinion on the matter at all. Maybe swaying more to with because some people cant have children and would like to have the experience of raising their own child. But that doesnt mean i am for gay couples being able to use serrogate mothers, DO NOT PASS ON YOUR TRAITS.
This is a tough subject to talk about. I really dont have an opinion on the matter at all. Maybe swaying more to with because some people cant have children and would like to have the experience of raising their own child. But that doesnt mean i am for gay couples being able to use serrogate mothers, DO NOT PASS ON YOUR TRAITS.
The article was very different. I don't think i would want to give up a baby that i just carried for 9 months no matter how much money you would be offering me. I wouldn't want to be global baby either knowing that my mom just gave me up because the money was the right amount. Now I don't think its fair that you have given up your baby to a couple and then later you decide you want the baby back i do not think that is the right then to do.
ReplyDeleteThe paragraph I read, I think that is not the new things I never hear about it. God create of us and gave us ability to have baby that man and wife after marry each other. And the paragraph talk about the man transform the sprem and to the other country hospital for another women to have baby, just benifit the people who cann't have baby and the gay couple want to adopt baby.But I don't think that is the bible told us to do, if for a example god don't want you to have baby must have plant for that , also god dosen't allowing homosexual that is why only man and women after marry can have baby. It is not the right way and that is doing the oppiside that bible told us to do.
ReplyDeleteafter reading the paragraph it still showed what i believe of no matter what you shouldnt give your kid up for money or try the surrogate process if you are homosexual because it is wrong one for being homosexual and two just transplanting your sperm into a woman just so she could have kid she cant even keep isnt right
ReplyDeleteThis article is about how a business that helps couples get babies through a surrogate and a sperm donor is very touchy. In some ways I agree with it like if a straight couple who were not able to have a baby used this program and had a baby that way is fine with me. But when a gay couple tries to use the program and it is illegal in other places for them to do so I think it would be wrong. I have no problem with gays being gays but lets say they get a kid and the kid is taught that being gay is the only path for them and the couple takes away that kids free will to do what they want. I think that is wrong and should be addressed for how they should raise the kid.
ReplyDeleteI don't think this is that great of a plan for having a baby I think people should do the traditional adopt a baby idea and it is more than wrong to basically sell yourself and in that manner sell your kid also because no matter how much money you make you have to love with the fact that you just gave up your kid
ReplyDeleteThe article is about couples getting help from surrogates to have a child.It is emotional for most couples if they can't have a baby and the only chance they have to having a child it's through this process or adoption.There is no problem with going through this process but there is a lot of work,patience,determination that comes with it.I also see that there is no problem with gay couples trying to have a baby because they will do,treat and educate their child the same way a normal couple would.They should be given the chance to experience and have a family.This is also a really hard job for most surrogates because most of them get attach to the child and still has the child taken away from them because they agreed with the law to give the child up once it's born.I think this is a miracle for most couples who can't have babies;this is their second chance of having a family.
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed this article, however, I don't think its right to bring life into the world and then just give up. I understand that a lot of people aren't ready for responsibilities so they rather put it off on someone else. To sell yourself is one thing, but to sell a child is extreme. No amount of money is worth you giving up your child and its sad that people actually consider that option.
ReplyDeleteI found this to be a bit extraordinary. Most people wouldn't think twice about rejected such a plan. However, is it really wrong for this to happen? One woman couldn't have a baby for medical reasons. The man donated his sperm so that it could be introduced to the egg artificially. The man didn't commit adultery by doing so and neither did either woman. All that occurred was legal and shows a group of people from around the globe working together toward a common task.
ReplyDeletethis article is about a tough subject for some to understand, surrogates. I feel like it's a blessing to families who are not able to conceive children to have a surrogate to carry your child. some might not understand the process and some consider it adultery because the mans sperm is going in the woman but it's nowhere near that. I also think that you need to pick the right person to carry your child for you. has to be Christian, responsible, healthy, mature, etc. a person just like you who's willing to carry the baby.
ReplyDeleteThe subject of surrogates if a controversial subject for many people. For me, I believe it should be available for women. If they want to have a child with their DNA in it they should be able to. If someone else wants to give some others a chance to start a family then they should be able to make that choice without people judging them for it. If they want to adopt or use surrogates, either is fine in my eyes.
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteThis a weird article. Personally I think there's nothing wrong with having a surrogate to carry your child. A lot of people don't really know the process of this and that's why the disagree with this procedure. But I still think that adopting a baby would be a better idea. It really depends on the persons preference but either way is cool I guess, it doesn't affect me.
This article was kind of weird and is a touchy subject . I can understand why people would want to do this . If they can't have a baby , I see why they would want to do this but I & a lot of people would not agree with it . How can you hold a baby inside of you for nine months and then just give it away ? How would the baby feel , growing up and possibly finding out about all of it ? I don't agree with it but it's up to the people who are put in the situation . I think it would be better to just adopt like how most people have done it but it's up to them .
ReplyDeleteHonestly, I understand that she was trying to do something nice for her children and a but you can't just breed another baby to give away for money no matter how much, that is no excuse, because if baby finds out that that was the case it was born it will grow up hating forever and feel like a mistake or used.
ReplyDeleteThis article i read was vey interesting. If somebody would want me to have their child i think i would have to much of an emotional attachment to the child cause of the person i am. But i agree that her other children must come first and they are important and so are their futures. I think the parents should of though about adopting a child then putting another human being thru this.
ReplyDeleteThis article was a tough topic. I feel that it is mostly wrong to do something like that because you're kind of selling yourself and your baby. It can benefit some people that can't necessarily afford to adopt or have someone carry a baby for them so this can go both ways honestly. I just wouldn't want to live with the fact that im selling my kid if that was me
ReplyDeleteThis article was a tough topic. I feel that it is mostly wrong to do something like that because you're kind of selling yourself and your baby. It can benefit some people that can't necessarily afford to adopt or have someone carry a baby for them so this can go both ways honestly. I just wouldn't want to live with the fact that im selling my kid if that was me
ReplyDeleteThis is a really hard subject to talk about. I am almost at a loss for words and that is not because I have never heard of this before but simply because I don't know how I feel about this. I completely understand wanting to have a baby even when you're not able to. I believe every stable woman who wants to have a child should be given the opportunity to do so but I don't know how I feel about this particular process. I am undecided for several reasons. I also assume it must be hard for the surrogate mothers to let go of the children because whether they want to admit it or not, there must be some type of emotional attachment. I would have to read more articles and look into this a little deeper to develop a stronger and clearer opinion.
ReplyDeleteAfter reading this paragraph, I think I would not give up a baby that I had to carry in my womb for 9 months. I would not do it for any kind of money, if the parents can not have a baby, I would tell them to adopt, but that's just me. I also think after having a baby in your womb for 9 months, it would be very hard to give that baby to some other people, you would have plenty of feelings toward that baby, that the other person does not.
ReplyDeleteThis is a tough subject to talk about. I really dont have an opinion on the matter at all. Maybe swaying more to with because some people cant have children and would like to have the experience of raising their own child. But that doesnt mean i am for gay couples being able to use serrogate mothers, DO NOT PASS ON YOUR TRAITS.
ReplyDeleteThis is a tough subject to talk about. I really dont have an opinion on the matter at all. Maybe swaying more to with because some people cant have children and would like to have the experience of raising their own child. But that doesnt mean i am for gay couples being able to use serrogate mothers, DO NOT PASS ON YOUR TRAITS.
ReplyDelete